Results of Platform Debates on Carbon Policy in Discussion
Section
Winning Platforms Fall 2018
Section |
Section_time |
Teach_Asst |
Winning Platform |
Economic Justification |
votes_YES |
votes_NO |
2 |
10:10 AM‑11:00 AM W Hubert H. Humphrey School 35 |
Sean Bassler |
Cap n Trade on CO2 emissions with tradeable CO2 permits |
Tradeable C02 and a graduale cap on CO2 emissions will minimize
disruption to market while lowering pollution |
Overwhellming majoriy |
|
3 |
10:10 AM‑11:00 AM W Blegen Hall 140 |
Johanna Swab |
Subsidy on electric cars |
Since electric cars do not have high negative externalities like
regular cars we should encourage their purchase; a subsidy would lower the
price to the buyer and raise the price to the seller, which would encourage
car companies to make more electric cars and consumers to buy more electric
cars. |
24 |
5 |
4 |
10:10 AM‑11:00 AM W Blegen Hall 330 |
Tomas Rose |
Subsidy program on both firms and consumers to reduce CO2
emissions |
On a cost-benefit analysis at the firm level, with a subsidy,
switching to alternative fuels won't be too costly. On the consumer side,
foster the use of public transport and/or purchases of electric vehicles
(thus reducing CO2 by lowering the number of cars in the streets) |
19 |
15 |
5 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM W Blegen Hall 140 |
Ju Young Yang |
a cap and trade system |
It incentives companies to innovate a more efficient means of
energy production and eco-friendly products. |
19 |
8 |
6 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM W Blegen Hall 125 |
Hayagreev Ramesh |
Cap & Trade carbon, increase gas tax, subsidize green energy |
Fossil fuels have negative externalities so taxing them is good,
subsidizing green energy will lead to faster adoption and decrease fossil
fuel consumption further |
||
8 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM W Blegen Hall 415 |
Yan Zhao |
impose a $0.25 per gallon tax increase on premium gasoline and a
$0.20 per gallon tax increase on regular gasoline for the next 10 years. |
Demand on gasoline is inelastic, so if the tax is not enough to
sway consumers from purchasing gasoline, they will still be helping our cause
if their purchases of gasoline increase the tax revenue.Goal of tax revenue
is to put the money towards finding more clean, renewable energy sources and
electric cars. |
18 |
9 |
9 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM W Blegen Hall 140 |
Mahdi Ansari |
Cap and Trade |
1. Incentivise firms to be more environmentally clean 2. More efficient than imposing tax (in
terms of total surplus) since market based 3. Controlling Carbon emission
while generating government revenues. |
14 |
7 |
11 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM W Blegen Hall 225 |
Omer Ceyhan |
Decrease the 32.5 gigatons of Carbon Emissions (2017) every year
by 2 gigatons a year with a cap and trade system giving each country the same
initial starting amount allowed and letting them trade their allowed
emissions with one another. |
It creates a new economic resource for industries. It allows for
a predetermined maximum level of emissions. It can be a way to supplement
taxpayer resources, governments will purchase credits and sell them to
businesses reducing taxes on the consumer. It will help fund alternative
energy sources. It will encourage businesses to utilize cleaner energy in the
future. A cleaner living environment for the consumer. |
14 |
8 |
12 |
10:10 AM‑11:00 AM W Blegen Hall 215 |
Caitlin Treanor |
||||
13 |
01:25 PM‑02:15 PM W Blegen Hall 140 |
Mahdi Ansari |
Subsidizing Public Transportation |
1. Large fraction of air pollution is due to cars not companies
which would not be controlled by tax or cap & trade 2. Public transportation is generally a
good thing, developing the city, benefiting everybody, etc. |
10 |
9 |
15 |
02:30 PM‑03:20 PM W Blegen Hall 145 |
Johanna Swab |
||||
16 |
02:30 PM‑03:20 PM W Blegen Hall 140 |
Tomas Rose |
A 22 dollars carbon tax to reduce fossil fuel consumption. The
tax would increase on an yearly basis |
Taxes are more straightforward and (based on existing evidence)
have proven to be more effective in achieving these results |
9 |
1 |
18 |
08:00 AM‑08:50 AM W Blegen Hall 240 |
Caitlin Treanor |
Carbon tax |
Tax on carbon emissions requires producers to pay fees per
metric ton proportional to how much firms consume. Revenue can be used to
promote alternative energies. Incremental implementation of tax to gather
information on how firms respond, and then adjust accordingly. |
||
19 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM F Blegen Hall 230 |
JOSEPH PEDTKE |
Incremental gas tax |
By instituting a gas tax that gradually increases over time,
consumers will be incentivized to begin altering their behavior regarding
cars. The gradual increases will give consumers enough time to adjust their
habits - find more green-friendly ways of commuting (more efficient cars),
use public transportation, save up money to by newer models, etc. so that the
government can raise more money to address carbon emissions while not
instantaneously having their wallet hit hard. |
9 |
|
20 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM F Blegen Hall 220 |
Sean Bassler |
Tax on CO2 emissions |
A tax on CO2 emissions will lower the demand for things that
produce CO2, and thus lower CO2 emissions |
80% |
20% |
21 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM F Blegen Hall 145 |
Seungyoon Jeong |
Propose a Global Trade Agreement that American companies with
competitive advantages in specialized technologies of “reducing carbon
emissions" to be incentivised to be shared abroad with other growing
countries |
* Give developing countries the efficient technology without
just upright charging them or putting them in financial debt for it. Rather
we find fair efficient compromise and trade agreements. |
18 |
8 |
23 |
09:05 AM‑09:55 AM F Blegen Hall 145 |
Seungyoon Jeong |
Propose an allocation of tradeable or sellable permits to every
country |
* Each country will be forced to produce a certain amount of
carbon emissions or pay to buy permits. This allows firms to adjust to
limited emissions over time. |
28 |
7 |
24 |
11:15 AM‑12:05 PM F Blegen Hall 240 |
Jacob Strauss |
1) Increase the federal gas tax. 2) Use the increased gas tax to
subsidize public transportation and renewable energy. 3) Cap and trade on
emissions from manufacturing. |
The plan will reduce private consumption of gasoline and thereby
reduce the negative externalities from gasoline consumption. The money from
the tax will be used to increase the usage and availability of public
transportation and renewable energy. The cap and trade will limit carbon
emissions from manufacturing. |
Unanimous |
|
25 |
09:05 AM‑09:55 AM F Blegen Hall 205 |
Jacob Strauss |
1) Increase the federal gas tax. 2) Use the increased gas tax to
subsidize public transportation and renewable energy. 3) Cap and trade on
emissions from mining and manufacturing. |
The platform's aim is to reduce private consumption of gasoline
while increasing the availability of alternatives via the subsidies. In
addition, the cap and trade will gradually reduce mining and also limit
emissions from manufacturing. |
Unanimous |
|
26 |
09:05 AM‑09:55 AM F Blegen Hall 225 |
Tomas Rose |
Cap and trade proposal to stop deforestation, with a program
design on a specific regional-features bases |
Forest areas play an essential role in the preservation of the
environment, since they absorbe CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, thus
constituing a powerfull tool to deal with CO2 emissions. Rather than simply
focusing on policies that target the emissions themselves, forest preservation
is an alternative way to deal with the problem |
21 |
12 |
27 |
09:05 AM‑09:55 AM F Blegen Hall 260 |
Johanna Swab |
Tax on Fuel Inefficient Cars |
Since pollution has a negative externality, taxing the purchase
of new, personal use cars with low gas mileage will lower the equilibrium
quantity towards the socially efficient level. |
20 |
9 |
28 |
01:25 PM‑02:15 PM F Blegen Hall 230 |
Ju Young Yang |
a cap and trade system |
cap and trade models have the added benefit that those who stay
in the market will retain the maximum possible profit that also decreases the
carbon output as a whole, as opposed to a tax, which would further decrease
their profit by having it go to the government. |
21 |
8 |
29 |
01:25 PM‑02:15 PM F Blegen Hall 260 |
Yan Zhao |
The government should subsidize factories up to 25% that switch
to solar energy by 2030. |
In the past five years, the cost of solar panels has dropped 5%
in price, so it will keep becoming less expensive to install and as more
factories switch to it, the price will keep getting driven down. Even though
switching to renweable is very expensive, it will be cheaper in the long run
than if we continue to keep emitted a ton of carbon into the air. |
22 |
10 |
32 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM F Blegen Hall 140 |
Hayagreev Ramesh |
Command & Control - Have gas tax and enforce the change to
electric/hybrid vehicles, construct more charging stations |
Reduce carbon emissions to sustainable level |
||
33 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM F Blegen Hall 115 |
Robert Winslow |
||||
34 |
02:30 PM‑03:20 PM W Blegen Hall 130 |
Seungyoon Jeong |
Propose a transportation and renewable energey subsidy so that
cities and states within the US are able to build and sustain more affordable
and accessible public transportation and energy sources. |
* make people less drive and increased use of mass transportation
because of lower cost to access them |
24 |
11 |
35 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM F Blegen Hall 125 |
Ju Young Yang |
a cap and trade system |
cap and trade has shown to decrease spending costs on reducing
emissions and in a timely manner, whereas gas taxes will cause a price
increase as well-subsidizing new ways to produce energy involves increased
government spending which could mean increasedother type taxes (sales tax,
for example) |
20 |
7 |
37 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM F Blegen Hall 240 |
Mahdi Ansari |
Cap and Trade |
1. Incentivise firms to be more environmentally clean 2. More efficient than imposing tax (in
terms of total surplus) since market based 3. Controlling Carbon emission
while generating government revenues. |
9 |
9 |
41 |
01:25 PM‑02:15 PM F Blegen Hall 240 |
Omer Ceyhan |
Due to the fact that the U.S. pulled out of the Paris Agreement
in June 2017, we propose a national level cap-and-trade solution to limiting
the amount of carbon emissions in the environment.This market-based policy
solution will provide private companies the adequate incentive to solve the
problem of their production within a trading scheme. |
The allowances will inevitably end up in the hands of the most
energy-efficient producers, ensuring that the level of carbon emissions
lowers. The rising cost of energy and energy-intensive products will
motivate households and firms to find solutions that reduce the
consumption of carbon. The cap will incentivise producers to work
efficiently: producers will seek the highest profit possible under the
restriction, turning to trade if they need to compensate in dollars for a
large amount of carbon emissions (which would otherwise be penalized). |
17 |
6 |
42 |
09:05 AM‑09:55 AM F Blegen Hall 335 |
JOSEPH PEDTKE |
Cap and trade, limit on emissions. |
Reduses usage of fossil fuels by capping the amount of
production/emissions. Countries can trade allowances for production. Lower
cost firms (maybe in developed countries) would be able to sell allowances
and invest in different technologies. More incentives to use greener
technology. Maximizes efficiency in the market relative to other policies.
Has worked for other similar issues and more likely to get consensus. |
14 |
17 |
43 |
12:20 PM‑01:10 PM F Blegen Hall 110 |
Mateus Santos |
Progressive tax to carbon emission, and subsidize companies that
are focused on renewable energy. |
The progressive tax would allow people to change their
consumption over time, and not an immediate adjustment, causing a smaller
economic loss. The gas consumption would not decrease much in the short term
(inelastic), but this would change in the long term, including due to
adoption of different sources of energy or transportation. The subsidie would
incentivize the adoption of green energy. |
20 |
9 |
45 |
05:30 PM‑06:20 PM Th Blegen Hall 225 |
Mateus Santos |
Propose the implementation of a cap and trade on the emission of
carbon dioxide. |
Companies would have economic incentives to reduce their
emission and become more efficient. The cap would limit the amount pollution
created and the money for the allowances could be used to fund other green
forms of energy production. |
16 |
9 |
55 |
08:10 PM‑09:00 PM Th Blegen Hall 115 |
Caitlin Treanor |
Cap and Trade + Gas Tax |
Cap and Trade allows for more control over the quantity of
emissions. It will create incentives to switch to clean power sources. Small
gas tax that increases over time to incentivize car owners to invest in more
environmentally friendly cars while allowing time to adjust. |
||
63 |
05:30 PM‑06:20 PM Th Blegen Hall 205 |
Yan Zhao |
subsidize farmers to give up 5% of their land for carbon
farming; private research companies like Shell will also be subsidized about
$500 million per year for at least 15 years to research large scale bioenergy
with carbon capture and storage. |
With this subsidy, the companies can then further their research
and potentially create the vast machines to cause negative emissions; this
will lead to many jobs being created, which will be taxed, helping the
economy for all society. Carbon farming has compost covering the land; the
compost then absorbs some of the carbon in the air. The bioenergy will create
heat and power by burning trees that have carbon stored in them. Carbon
capture and storage push carbon emissions deep into the ground. This is a
better option for society to invest in because it allows us to keep our
standard of living, and it doesn't push back the problem of carbon emissions
onto the next generations. |
23 |
8 |
65 |
05:30 PM‑06:20 PM T Blegen Hall 205 |
Hayagreev Ramesh |
Tax carbon emissions, increasing tax with time |
Deficit reduction, prices reflect cost to society, slow increase
gives time to adjust, reduce carbon emissions to sustainable level |
||
67 |
05:30 PM‑06:20 PM T Blegen Hall 335 |
Mateus Santos |
The subsidie would incentivize the adoption of green energy. |
The policy would generate incentives for firms becoming more
productives to meet the cap. Also, the market for quotas would allow firms to
trade their quotas. It could be implemented in the short-term. |
24 |
4 |
68 |
05:30 PM‑06:20 PM Th Blegen Hall 335 |
Omer Ceyhan |
1.U.S. Government gives out a certain amount of Trade Permits /
Quota which can be bought and sold. (Permits are to be allocated, not
initially purchased from the government to allow businesses to instead invest
those funds into sustainable changes to reduce their emissions, allow for the
government to hold the power to decide the most efficient way doll out/price
Trade Permits and Quota to reduce emissions, and prevent rich corporations
from buying up large amounts of permits.). 2.Quota and or a
tradable permit price could be standardized across states, or
internationally, or not at all (Quota amount and or permit price could be
adjusted different based on state, type of business, etc. 3.Amount of Quota and or
permit price could be adjusted based on current economic factors and amount
of emission reduction after initial results, increased or decreased as
needed. |
Cap-and-trade is inherently is more flexible, allowing for a
smoother market adjustment compared to the implementation of a tax or
government regulation, where the costs to businesses are immediate, set and
unavoidable, cap-and-trade costs less for corporations than government
regulation or taxes, as it allows for period of adjustment, since some
corporations take differing amounts of time and require different costs to
adjust to the imposed quota. With cap-and-trade, deadweight loss will likely
be lower than taxes, regulation or subsides, and overall cost for businesses
to reduce of emissions will be lower and more efficient when they can trade
among themselves on the free market. |
23 |
6 |
74 |
02:30 PM‑03:20 PM W Blegen Hall 415 |
Jacob Strauss |
1. Put subsidies on public transportation and renewable energy.
2. Cap and trade on carbon for the manufacturing sector. |
Subsidies will increase the quantity of public transportation
and renewable energy to the socially optimal amount; that is the amount that
maximizes the positive externality. Cap and trade with tradeable quotes will
reduce carbon emissions and allow firms to still maximize surplus under the
regime. |
16 |
14 |